Japanese public health nurses classified based on empathy and secondary traumatic stress: variable-centered and person-centered approaches.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare providers frequently help traumatized people and are regularly exposed to indirect trauma from their work, resulting in negative psychological responses, such as secondary traumatic stress. Empathy has been associated with patient's quality of care and secondary traumatic stress among healthcare providers. However, the relationship between dispositional empathy and secondary traumatic stress has not been fully elucidated. This study used person- and variable-centered approaches to explore the nature of this relationship. METHODS: A total of 1,006 Japanese public health nurses working in the Tohoku region and Saitama prefecture completed questionnaires that included scales assessing dispositional empathy, secondary traumatic stress, and burnout. First, we examined predictors of secondary traumatic stress using multiple linear regression analysis. Then, we conducted a latent profile analysis to classify participants into unique groups based on four subscales of dispositional empathy (i.e., empathic concern, perspective taking, personal distress, fantasy) and secondary traumatic stress. Finally, we compared the mean values of the study variables across these groups. RESULTS: The multiple regression indicated that in those working in Saitama prefecture, lifetime traumatic experiences, work-related distress, and personal distress were positively related to secondary traumatic stress, but perceived support was negatively related to secondary traumatic stress. Latent profile analysis extracted four unique subgroups. Group 1 displayed the highest secondary traumatic stress levels. Group 2 was characterized by the highest level of empathic concern, personal distress, and fantasy and the lowest perspective taking. Group 3 had a moderate secondary traumatic stress level. Group 4 had the lowest secondary traumatic stress and personal distress scores. In these four groups, the burnout scale (exhaustion, cynicism, and professional efficacy) showed a pattern similar to the secondary traumatic stress scale. CONCLUSIONS: Our person-centered approach showed that this sample of public health nurses could be classified into four unique groups based on their empathy and secondary traumatic stress scores. Although this group of public health nurses was not large, one group displayed high personal distress levels and high secondary traumatic stress levels. Further research is needed to determine effective interventions for this group.

Identifying factors related to stigma toward psychiatric illness and mental health services and attitudes of help-seeking among Japan Ground Self-Defense Force members.

The stigma that military personnel feel toward mental illness and mental healthcare hinders their access to mental health services. Stigma is influenced by culture-specifically, that held by military personnel is closely related to military culture. To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale investigation aimed at identifying the factors, including demographic factors and elements of military culture, related to stigma among members of the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force. An anonymous questionnaire was administered to 4754 members. The questionnaire included items regarding demographic factors, history of psychiatric visits, military rank, overseas deployment experience, disaster relief experience, supervisor leadership, unit cohesion, general psychological distress, stigma toward perceived mental illness, and attitudes toward help-seeking. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify the various factors related to stigma. Responses were obtained from 4305 (90.5%) participants, among which 3723 (78.3%) were valid. Multiple regression analyses revealed that a variety of factors including age, psychiatric consultation, leadership, and cohesiveness were markedly associated with stigma and attitudes toward help-seeking. This study revealed that various factors including demographic factors and military culture factors such as supervisor leadership and unit cohesion are related to stigma and attitudes toward mental health services among Japan Ground Self-Defense Force personnel. Further studies are needed to examine the results in depth.

Validity and reliability of the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale-Japanese version.

AIM: This study assessed the validity and reliability of the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale-Japanese Version. METHODS: The original Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale was translated into Japanese, and Japanese items were back-translated to English to confirm the accuracy of the translation. A total of 870 public health nurses from the Tohoku region in Japan completed the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale-Japanese Version. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to identify the number of components. Moreover, 351 public health nurses from the Saitama prefecture in Japan also completed the scale. A confirmatory factor analysis was performed with the factor structure identified in the exploratory factor analysis. RESULTS: The exploratory factor analysis identified two components: one associated with client-related distress and the other with trauma-related distress. The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the two-factor structure. The two-factor structure model was better than the three-factor model presented in the original validation study for the English version of the scale. The two-factor model had good internal consistency for the overall product and the subscales. Pearson correlations showed that this model had good convergent validity against the Maslach Burnout Inventory, a psychological measure similar to the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale. Finally, the two-factor model had good discriminant validity against the Maslach Burnout Inventory. CONCLUSION: This study identified two components of the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale-Japanese Version that differ from the three components found in the original English version. The differences in the factor structure might indicate that the factor structure was culturally influenced.

The relationship between dispositional empathy, psychological distress, and posttraumatic stress responses among Japanese uniformed disaster workers: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Disaster workers suffer from psychological distress not only through the direct experience of traumatic situations but also through the indirect process of aiding disaster victims. This distress, called secondary traumatic stress, is linked to dispositional empathy, which is the tendency for individuals to imagine and experience the feelings and experiences of others. However, the association between secondary traumatic stress and dispositional empathy remains understudied. METHODS: To examine the relationship between dispositional empathy and mental health among disaster workers, we collected data from 227 Japan Ground Self-Defense Force personnel who engaged in international disaster relief activities in the Philippines following Typhoon Yolanda in 2013. The Impact of Event Scale-Revised and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale were used to evaluate posttraumatic stress responses (PTSR) and general psychological distress (GPD), respectively. Dispositional empathy was evaluated through the Interpersonal Reactivity Index, which consists of four subscales: Perspective Taking, Fantasy, Empathic Concern, and Personal Distress. Hierarchial linear regression analyses were performed to identify the variables related to PTSR and GPD. RESULTS: High PTSR was significantly associated with high Fantasy (identification tendency, ß = 0.21, p < .01), high Personal Distress (the self-oriented emotional disposition of empathy, ß = 0.18, p < .05), and no experience of disaster relief activities (ß = 0.15, p < .05). High GPD was associated with high Personal Distress (ß = 0.28, p < .001), marital status (married, ß = 0.22, p < .01), being female (ß = 0.18, p < .01), medical unit (ß = 0.18, p < .05), and no experience of disaster relief activities (ß = 0.13, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Among Japanese uniformed disaster workers, high PTSR was associated with two subtypes of dispositional empathy: the self-oriented emotional disposition of empathy and high identification tendency, whereas high GPD was associated with high identification tendency. Educational interventions that aim to mitigate these tendencies might be able to relieve the psychological distress of disaster workers.